PV Screw Corrosion Protection Process Comparison

  • Home
  • Science and technology
PV Screw Corrosion Protection Process Comparison

PV screw corrosion protection process comparison:

1. Stainless Steel Material

  • 304 stainless: Good corrosion resistance, general environment
  • 316 stainless: Contains molybdenum, salt spray resistant
  • Advantages: No surface treatment needed, aesthetic
  • Disadvantages: Higher cost, slightly lower strength than carbon steel

2. Hot-dip Galvanizing

  • Zinc coating: 60-80μm
  • Salt spray test: 500-1000 hours
  • Advantages: Good corrosion protection, moderate cost
  • Disadvantages: Thick coating affects dimensional accuracy
  • Application: Large ground stations

3. Dacromet Coating

  • Coating thickness: 8-12μm
  • Salt spray test: 600-1200 hours
  • Advantages: High dimensional accuracy, no hydrogen embrittlement
  • Disadvantages: Higher cost, single color (silver gray)
  • Application: Precision connections

4. Electro-galvanizing

  • Zinc coating: 5-15μm
  • Salt spray test: 72-200 hours
  • Advantages: Low cost, bright appearance
  • Disadvantages: Moderate corrosion protection
  • Application: Indoor or dry environments

Selection Guide:

  • Coastal areas: 316 stainless or hot-dip galvanized
  • General outdoor: 304 stainless or Dacromet
  • Large stations: Hot-dip galvanized (cost advantage)
  • Precision connections: Dacromet (dimensional accuracy)

Contact

Contact: Lizhong Deng

Phone: 13928071304

Tel: +86-756-8586520

Email: sales@jlfastener.com

Add: Room 56-301,Mingzhubeilu 388hao,Xiangzhou Area,Zhuhai City,GuangDong,China